Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S310942AbSCHQio>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:38:44 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S310944AbSCHQie>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:38:34 -0500
Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:31750 "HELO
	netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S310942AbSCHQiO>;
	Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:38:14 -0500
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:37:41 -0300 (BRT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com
To: Pau Aliagas <linuxnow@wanadoo.es>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Jonathan A. George" <JGeorge@greshamstorage.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081004190.2580-100000@pau.intranet.ct>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203081334250.2181-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org
X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Pau Aliagas wrote:

> I'd recommend everybody to give arch a try.

If you could setup a public arch repository of the 2.4 / 2.5
kernel of which everybody can copy/clone their arch kernel
repository, that would be a good start.

Even better would be an arch kernel repository that is kept
up-to-date (automatically?) or gated from the bitkeeper tree.

That would give us some real way to compare the two tools.

regards,

Rik
-- 
<insert bitkeeper endorsement here>

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/