Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:07:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:06:55 -0500 Received: from rogue.ncsl.nist.gov ([129.6.101.41]:57828 "EHLO rogue.ncsl.nist.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:06:41 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [lkml] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers In-Reply-To: <20020306090011.G15303@work.bitmover.com> <20020308100747.GB3650@merlin.emma.line.org> From: Ian Soboroff Date: 08 Mar 2002 13:05:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20020308100747.GB3650@merlin.emma.line.org> Message-ID: <9cfelivrl3q.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthias Andree writes: > Flame attractor: No sane person works with [t]csh. Let's see... we've had a SCM flamewar, a license flamewar, an Emacs/VI taunt or two, a csh/sh taunt, and even Hitler. Add this to the ESR flamewar, the devfs flamewar, the odd microkernel LART, and a spam or three. If we only had kibo, LKML would be USENET. (ducks) ian (a fried of whose once sig'ed: "Unencumbered with facts as I am, I will now comment." -- USENET motto) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/