Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S311095AbSCHUaf>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:30:35 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S311068AbSCHU3Q>; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:29:16 -0500
Received: from 213-97-45-174.uc.nombres.ttd.es ([213.97.45.174]:1799 "EHLO
	pau.intranet.ct") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S311084AbSCHU3D>;
	Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:29:03 -0500
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 21:28:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Pau Aliagas <linuxnow@wanadoo.es>
X-X-Sender: pau@pau.intranet.ct
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203081721050.2181-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203082125190.2580-100000@pau.intranet.ct>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > We need a reference archive to keep in sync with; then everybody
> > branches from there and syncs back and forth.
> 
> Exactly!  Now, is there some arch fan willing to setup this
> initial repository ?

I'll do it.

> > > That would give us some real way to compare the two tools.
> >
> > It seems obvious that bitkeeper is in very good shape; I'm not at all
> > against people using, but I'm sure that if a few people tried arch,
> > they'd be gratefully surprised.
> 
> Having an initial repository would get a lot of people
> (including me, once I have a bit of time) to try out
> arch.

We continue to discuss it in private and once it's ready and documented 
let the list know.

Pau

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/