Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1759713AbZF2PAc@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1759713AbZF2PAc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:00:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753487AbZF2PAZ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:00:25 -0400
Received: from mail-gx0-f226.google.com ([209.85.217.226]:43898 "EHLO
	mail-gx0-f226.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751515AbZF2PAY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:00:24 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=GuVwGSuPYPxVw0UiaJL/7kJBxBu8jPr5h2Qus/1t5AZX0ea6fgAHaRCqcfaCGKbnAN
         +VEFbgVZlUgR2Egkkiw/hAI1TTNcyXBD1JKWQCTi2EDwjBDq7bQVhDIa3GKs8pEDu/uu
         kKPQML5ChAZyNs0EMkI/vqaamAkPy+tMPHDW0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <29432.1246285300@redhat.com>
References: <26537.1246086769@redhat.com>
	 <28c262360906280630n557bb182n5079e33d21ea4a83@mail.gmail.com>
	 <28c262360906280636l93130ffk14086314e2a6dcb7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090628142239.GA20986@localhost>
	 <2f11576a0906280801w417d1b9fpe10585b7a641d41b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090628151026.GB25076@localhost>
	 <20090629091741.ab815ae7.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop>
	 <17678.1246270219@redhat.com> <20090629125549.GA22932@localhost>
	 <29432.1246285300@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:26 +0900
Message-ID: <28c262360906290800v37f91d7av3642b1ad8b5f0477@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Found the commit that causes the OOMs
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
       KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
       Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
       "riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
       "peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
       "tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>,
       "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
       "elladan@eskimo.com" <elladan@eskimo.com>,
       "npiggin@suse.de" <npiggin@suse.de>,
       "Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2771
Lines: 63

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:21 PM, David Howells<dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry! This one compiles OK:
>
> Sadly that doesn't seem to work either:
>
> msgctl11 invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x200da, order=0, oom_adj=0
> msgctl11 cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0
> Pid: 30858, comm: msgctl11 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc1-cachefs #146
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8107207e>] ? oom_kill_process.clone.0+0xa9/0x245
>  [<ffffffff81072345>] ? __out_of_memory+0x12b/0x142
>  [<ffffffff810723c6>] ? out_of_memory+0x6a/0x94
>  [<ffffffff81074a90>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x42e/0x51d
>  [<ffffffff81080843>] ? do_wp_page+0x2c6/0x5f5
>  [<ffffffff810820c1>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x5dd/0x62f
>  [<ffffffff81022c32>] ? do_page_fault+0x1f8/0x20d
>  [<ffffffff812e069f>] ? page_fault+0x1f/0x30
> Mem-Info:
> DMA per-cpu:
> CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
> CPU    1: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
> DMA32 per-cpu:
> CPU    0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  38
> CPU    1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 106
> Active_anon:75040 active_file:0 inactive_anon:2031
>  inactive_file:0 unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
>  free:1951 slab:41499 mapped:301 pagetables:60674 bounce:0
> DMA free:3932kB min:60kB low:72kB high:88kB active_anon:2868kB inactive_anon:384kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:15364kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 968 968 968
> DMA32 free:3872kB min:3948kB low:4932kB high:5920kB active_anon:297292kB inactive_anon:7740kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB present:992032kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
> DMA: 7*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3932kB
> DMA32: 500*4kB 2*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3872kB
> 1928 total pagecache pages
> 0 pages in swap cache
> Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
> Free swap  = 0kB
> Total swap = 0kB
> 255744 pages RAM
> 5589 pages reserved
> 238251 pages shared
> 216210 pages non-shared
> Out of memory: kill process 25221 (msgctl11) score 130560 or a child
> Killed process 26379 (msgctl11)

Totally, I can't understand this situation.
Now, this page allocation is order zero and It is just likely GFP_HIGHUSER.
So it's unlikely interrupt context.

Buddy already has enough fallback DMA32, I think.
Why kernel can't allocate page for order 0 ?
Is it allocator bug ?

-- 
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/