Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:45:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:45:16 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:36614 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:44:57 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Futexes IV (Fast Lightweight Userspace Semaphores) Date: 8 Mar 2002 15:44:45 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20020308225425.772D13FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <20020308225425.772D13FE06@smtp.linux.ibm.com> By author: Hubertus Franke In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > Can we go to cache line alignment - for an array of locks thats clearly > > advantageous > > NO and let me explain. > > I would to be able to integrate the lock with the data. > This is much more cache friendly then putting the lock on a different > cacheline. > Not just cache, but programmer-friendly as well. Data structures containing locks (sometimes multiple and related) are really the common case. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/