Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760308AbZF2Xg3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:36:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753245AbZF2XgT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:36:19 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.ad.jp ([210.171.162.6]:44068 "EHLO mail.officemail.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747AbZF2XgS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:36:18 -0400 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: tridge@samba.org Cc: Greg KH , "Eric W. Biederman" , john.lanza@linux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , Steve French , Mingming Cao , Paul McKenney Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option References: <19013.8005.541836.436991@samba.org> <19014.54044.484370.187018@samba.org> <19015.482.794111.612472@samba.org> <87ab3sx4ch.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <19016.6463.997760.757811@samba.org> <20090629221826.GA12781@kroah.com> <19017.17250.371594.268824@samba.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:36:13 +0900 In-Reply-To: <19017.17250.371594.268824@samba.org> (tridge@samba.org's message of "Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:42:42 +1000") Message-ID: <87tz1ymx3m.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for MailServers 5.5.10/RELEASE, bases: 24052007 #308098, status: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1226 Lines: 33 tridge@samba.org writes: > > I have no objection to take this patch for the -stable releases when it > > goes into Linus's tree. Just forward the git commit ids to > > stable@kernel.org and I can take care of it. > > ok, thanks Greg. > > Hirofumi-san tells me we've missed the merge window for 2.6.31, so it > seems that this will go first into the fatfs tree, then go into > Linus's tree via -next for 2.6.32. So hopefully the patch will get > some more testing (perhaps in -mm?) before it needs to be considered > for -stable. Yes. And I will not drop this patch even if it's not perfect on test. I can understand it would not be the option for some users. The default may be arguable though, like I said at first. My choice is to provide the option of those to users. > Meanwhile some of the distros and other vendors might decide to apply > it sooner depending on their level of legal concern. Yes, it's good. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/