Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary semicolons
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0906282314250.18021@wotan.suse.de>
References: <cover.1246173664.git.joe@perches.com>
	 <1ee6dd55768ebbbeb505c47e2944b683633be630.1246173680.git.joe@perches.com>
	 <20090628185102.47663e61@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
	 <20090628.113325.244931913.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <1246214678.13673.31.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
	 <alpine.LNX.2.00.0906282314250.18021@wotan.suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:15:53 -0700
Message-Id: <1246382153.6259.2.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 960
Lines: 20

On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 23:16 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > I'm all for this, to be honest, and I'm very much for rolling this 
> > > into one single patch too :)
> > Here's just the single one, but doesn't a patch that span multiple 
> > arches make it a bit more troublesome for the arch maintainers?
> Apparently subsystem maintainers started to pick the relevant bits into 
> their trees.
> After checking which ones were merged and which ones were not, if you 
> could create a single patch with the remaining bits, I'll happily take 
> them through the trivial queue.

I've no idea who picks up what.
Should this be rerolled against linux-next in a couple of weeks?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/