From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Wire up new syscalls
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:41:58 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.30-9-generic; KDE/4.2.90; x86_64; ; )
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, torvalds@osdl.org,
       akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20090630212454.19294.75622.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20090630213406.GB17492@elte.hu>
In-Reply-To: <20090630213406.GB17492@elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200906302341.58582.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 939
Lines: 22

On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Wire up new syscalls rt_tgsigqueueinfo and perf_counter_open.
> 
> > +     .long sys_perf_counter_open
> 
> Hm, i suspect this should be sys_ni because FRV does not set 
> HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS so perfcounters cannot be enabled. (Or do you 
> have patches in the pipeline that enable perfcounters for FRV?)

It doesn't matter because of the cond_syscall() in kernel/sys_ni.c.
Right now, scripts/checksyscalls.sh causes a warning on each architecture
that does not assign a system call number for sys_perf_counter_open,
so they might as well make it point to sys_ni though cond_syscall().

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/