Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751370AbZGAW5S (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:57:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751563AbZGAW5G (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:57:06 -0400 Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.fr ([140.77.166.68]:40666 "EHLO toccata.ens-lyon.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751051AbZGAW5F (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:57:05 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1852 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:57:05 EDT Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 00:19:04 +0200 From: Samuel Thibault To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] accessibility, speakup, speech synthesis & /sys Message-ID: <20090701221904.GA4431@const> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090625220452.GF5540@const.famille.thibault.fr> <20090630063454.GI1351@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090630063454.GI1351@ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1742 Lines: 42 Hello, Pavel Machek, le Tue 30 Jun 2009 08:34:54 +0200, a ?crit : > > Then there are the screen reading parameters. I'd tend to think that > > like there are /sys/{block,firmware,fs,power}, there could be a > > /sys/accessibility, or even shorter, /sys/a11y? Speakup parameters > > could then be in /sys/a11y/speakup? > > Please keep a11y and similar madness far from kernel. What do you qualify as "madness" precisely? Could you explain why you are using such extreme word? > /sys/speech ? Or even better /sys/class/speech? What is global about > it? As I said, there is a difference between speech synthesizers, which can easily be considered as devices, and screen readers (here, speakup), which could for instance use different synthesizers, so please don't mix them. Accessibility features, however, is not really a device, but as it was suggested it could go into the vtcon directory. > BTW... from 486+, cpus are fast enough for speech synthesis. Why not > doing it in software, viewing hw synthetisers as 'flite coprocessors'? At least because flite is very far from proprietary hardware synthesizers in terms of quality. > What modifications would be needed to make useful a11y w/o additional > hw? It depends on what you call "useful". The desktop can already use software speech synthesis. When / can't be mounted, you're hosed, however, unless you have shipped a full software speech synthesizer in initrd, but even in such case the initrd script could also fail. Samuel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/