Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:23:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:23:43 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:34567 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:23:34 -0500 Subject: RE: Kernel 2.5.6 Interactive performance From: Robert Love To: charles-heselton@cox.net Cc: Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= , Dan Mann , Linux Kernel List , "J.A. Magallon" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 09 Mar 2002 23:23:48 -0500 Message-Id: <1015734229.858.4.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 20:15, Charles Heselton wrote: > That would be great. I'm currently running 2.4.18. I'm always up for > things that would help improve performance, even if they are "experimental". A good base is Alan's tree, available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/linux-2.4/2.4.19/patch-2.4.19-pre2-ac4.gz which is to be applied on top of 2.4.19-pre2. It contains the O(1) scheduler and rmap VM. If you are interested in preemption, the preempt-kernel patch is available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/ The 2.5 tree also has most of these toys, and is a better place for this development IMO. Personally, I'd stay away from these all-in-one silly patches that are floating around these days. Your safest bet is just stock 2.4.18 or whatever is latest, although the above addons are all at varying levels of "stable" and "safe". Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/