Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:38:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:38:26 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:9982 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 23:38:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 20:38:54 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Robert Love Cc: charles-heselton@cox.net, Dieter N?tzel , Dan Mann , Linux Kernel List , "J.A. Magallon" Subject: Re: Kernel 2.5.6 Interactive performance Message-ID: <20020310043854.GA311@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Love , charles-heselton@cox.net, Dieter N?tzel , Dan Mann , Linux Kernel List , "J.A. Magallon" In-Reply-To: <1015734229.858.4.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1015734229.858.4.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:23:48PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 20:15, Charles Heselton wrote: > > > That would be great. I'm currently running 2.4.18. I'm always up for > > things that would help improve performance, even if they are "experimental". > > A good base is Alan's tree, available at: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/linux-2.4/2.4.19/patch-2.4.19-pre2-ac4.gz > > which is to be applied on top of 2.4.19-pre2. It contains the O(1) > scheduler and rmap VM. If you are interested in preemption, the > preempt-kernel patch is available at: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/ > > The 2.5 tree also has most of these toys, and is a better place for this > development IMO. Personally, I'd stay away from these all-in-one silly > patches that are floating around these days. Your safest bet is just > stock 2.4.18 or whatever is latest, although the above addons are all at > varying levels of "stable" and "safe". > Then what do you call -aa and -ac? ;) These "all-in-one" patches do make it harder to debug specific patches, but it does create a wider audience for many patches that wouldn't be used otherwise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/