Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755454AbZGBC1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:27:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753795AbZGBC1J (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:27:09 -0400 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:59704 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753606AbZGBC1I (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:27:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4A4C1B33.2030002@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:28:03 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Menage CC: Andrew Morton , "Serge E. Hallyn" , LKML , Linux Containers Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUGFIX] cgroups: fix pid namespace bug References: <4A4C0C60.4050106@cn.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830907011836x5eccc83eyc896a67295a6486d@mail.gmail.com> <4A4C18D5.7020806@cn.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830907011920r44df4022p53808b574da4a886@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830907011920r44df4022p53808b574da4a886@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 745 Lines: 18 Paul Menage wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Li Zefan wrote: >> But I guess we are going to fix the bug for 2.6.31? So is it ok to >> merge a new feature 'cgroup.procs' together into 2.6.31? >> > > Does this bug really need to be fixed for 2.6.31? I didn't think that > the namespace support in mainline was robust enough yet for people to > use them for virtual servers in production environments. > If so, it's ok for me. Unless someone else has objections. Serge? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/