Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752880AbZGCKK3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:10:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751718AbZGCKKV (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:10:21 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60852 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751145AbZGCKKT (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:10:19 -0400 From: Thomas Renninger Organization: SUSE Products GmbH To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Remove unneeded dbs_mutexes from ondemand and conservative governors Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:10:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.23-0.1-default; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: kernel@stable.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, rjw@sisk.pl, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, Venkatesh Pallipadi References: <20090623193215.GA31374@elte.hu> <1245938485-12663-2-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <20090630063339.GF1351@ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20090630063339.GF1351@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907031210.16828.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1255 Lines: 36 Hi Pavel, On Tuesday 30 June 2009 08:33:39 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2009-06-25 16:01:24, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > Comment from Venkatesh: > > ... > > This mutex is just serializing the changes to those variables. I could't > > think of any functionality issues of not having the lock as such. > > > > -> rip it out. > > > > CC: Venkatesh Pallipadi > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger > > > static struct dbs_tuners { > > @@ -236,10 +222,7 @@ static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct cpufreq_policy *unused, > > if (ret != 1 || input > MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR || input < 1) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex); > > dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_down_factor = input; > > - mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex); > > - > > You'd need to make s_down_factor atomic_t for this to work.... Can you provide a userspace scenario (or tell which kind of event must happen in between), that this would cause problems, please. Thanks, Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/