Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753806AbZGCKa0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:30:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751183AbZGCKaT (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:30:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:58404 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbZGCKaS (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 06:30:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 12:29:53 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Anton Blanchard , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , x86 maintainers , LKML , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem Message-ID: <20090703102953.GF32128@elte.hu> References: <1246440815.3403.3.camel@hpdv5.satnam> <1246440909.3403.5.camel@hpdv5.satnam> <1246440977.3403.7.camel@hpdv5.satnam> <1246441043.3403.9.camel@hpdv5.satnam> <20090701112007.GD15958@elte.hu> <20090701112704.GF15958@elte.hu> <1246448441.6940.3.camel@hpdv5.satnam> <20090701114928.GI15958@elte.hu> <1246527872.13659.2.camel@hpdv5.satnam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1246527872.13659.2.camel@hpdv5.satnam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 958 Lines: 25 * Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > Performance counter stats for '/usr/bin/rhythmbox /home/jaswinder/Music/singhiskinng.mp3': > > 17552264 vec-adds (scaled from 66.28%) > 19715258 vec-muls (scaled from 66.63%) > 15862733 vec-divs (scaled from 66.82%) > 23735187095 vec-idle-cycles (scaled from 66.89%) > 11353159 vec-stall-cycles (scaled from 66.90%) > 36628571 vec-ops (scaled from 66.48%) Is stall-cycles equivalent to busy-cycles? I.e. do we have this general relationship to the cycle event: cycles = vec-stall-cycles + vec-idle-cycles ? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/