Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:12:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:12:45 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:28789 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:12:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous rant) To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik) Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:12:47 +0100 (BST) Cc: pavel@suse.cz (Pavel Machek), torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds), andrewm@uow.edu.au (Andrew Morton), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (lkml) In-Reply-To: <39F9E849.D799D4A5@mandrakesoft.com> from "Jeff Garzik" at Oct 27, 2000 04:40:41 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Pavel Machek wrote: > > Would it be possible to keep 2.7.2.3? You still need 2.7.2.3 to > > reliably compile 2.0.X (and maybe even 2.2.all-but-latest?). > > What fails, when you use egcs-1.1.2 to build 2.0.x or early 2.2.x? egcs miscompiles inlined strstr. It gets combined with bad asm constraints to mean that 2.0 and earlier 2.2 will crash when fed the right (wrong ?) sequence of FPU ops to software emulate - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/