Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756661AbZGCNJs (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:09:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754198AbZGCNJl (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:09:41 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f215.google.com ([209.85.219.215]:47680 "EHLO mail-ew0-f215.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753850AbZGCNJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:09:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=CWoOkb1TcUNqpcDf+Z3+T1mXKn9iL17T3gwqLbmXHP+qc9XVTZp0HVCbFLvitZqvpP 8xsN3idumbBDkWBXJm1UFnuLrn4SntsVmqpch8vyeXalJ/MyOI9I8hHZPDbM98tSdr3P BKVVpA5aPsocxz0K3u9bWx/0lADAQ8/4xXOo0= Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 15:09:39 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput , Mike Galbraith , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Robert Richter , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Anton Blanchard , Sam Ravnborg , Peter Zijlstra , x86 maintainers , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf tools: gitignore *.data Message-ID: <20090703130936.GA5072@nowhere> References: <1246603147.2322.3.camel@jaswinder.satnam> <20090703103852.GA3242@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090703103852.GA3242@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1015 Lines: 32 On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > perf.data made by perf record is a data file and need to be > > ignored by git > > > > Added *.data so that perf.data and its friends will be ignored. > > > cscope* > > +*.data > > ok, this is something i wanted to revisit eventually - the > 'perf.data' name sucks a bit - as .data postfix is quite unspecific. > > Perhaps trace.perf is a better default name, and all files would > have the .perf postfix? > > I've Cc:-ed a number of folks who might have an opinion about this - > what would be the best default naming and postfix for perf binary > files? > > Ingo perf.bin seems to me adequate as it tells everything (IMHO). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/