Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 17:07:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 17:06:59 -0500 Received: from tapu.f00f.org ([66.60.186.129]:50820 "EHLO tapu.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 17:06:51 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:05:57 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Robert Love Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] syscall interface for cpu affinity Message-ID: <20020310220557.GA12383@tapu.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <1015784104.1261.8.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1015784104.1261.8.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 01:15:03PM -0500, Robert Love wrote: I have updated the patch a bit and resycned to 2.5.6. Are you interested? I believe a user interface for setting task CPU affinity is useful and completes the rest of our sched_* syscalls. A syscall implementation seems to be what everyone wants (I have a proc-interface, too...) Can't wer just copy the IRIX interface here as some other pathces have in the past? --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/