Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S293167AbSCKGQG>; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:16:06 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S293299AbSCKGPz>; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:15:55 -0500
Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:38413 "HELO
	thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S293167AbSCKGPn>; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:15:43 -0500
Message-ID: <3C8C4B8A.2070508@namesys.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:15:38 +0300
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
CC: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>, Itai Nahshon <itai@siftology.com>,
        Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, Tom Lord <lord@regexps.com>,
        jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0203110051500.9713-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Alexander Viro wrote:

>
>On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>>So the problem was that it was not optional?
>>
>
>The problem is that it doesn't play well with other things.
>
Your statement is information free so far, but could be the intro to an 
informative statement....;-)

Hans


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/