Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:49:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:49:03 -0500 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:25608 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 01:48:51 -0500 Message-Id: <200203110646.g2B6kWq03689@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Denis Vlasenko Reply-To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua To: "Martin J. Bligh" , lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: 23 second kernel compile (aka which patches help scalibility on NUMA) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:45:44 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <82825246.1015624024@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <82825246.1015624024@[10.10.2.3]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9 March 2002 03:47, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > "time make -j32 bzImage" is now down to 23 seconds. > (16 way NUMA-Q, 700MHz P3's, 4Gb RAM). ... > Any other suggestions are welcome. I'd also be interested > to know if 23s is fast for make bzImage, or if other big > iron machines can kick this around the room. I'm curious how long "time make -j32 bzImage" takes on your setup when: 1) only one node is enabled, 2) only one CPU is enabled? this will give you a clue how close you are to 'perfect' scalability. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/