Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753497AbZGFQJ5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:09:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751868AbZGFQJu (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:09:50 -0400 Received: from araneidae.co.uk ([62.3.233.233]:3514 "EHLO araneidae.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741AbZGFQJt (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:09:49 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1262 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:09:49 EDT Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:09:51 +0100 (BST) From: Michael Abbott To: Jan Engelhardt cc: Martin Schwidefsky , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: /proc/uptime idle counter remains at 0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20090525122820.044e1e35@skybase> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 631 Lines: 15 On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Monday 2009-07-06 17:48, Michael Abbott wrote: > >[...] > >why am I still allowing uptime to overflow in a year and four months or > >so? > Is not this addressed by 64-bit jiffies already? Possibly, sorry, not terribly familiar with the underlying infrastructure, just trying to fix one bug without being dragged under by all the rest! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/