Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 05:08:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 05:08:16 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:5636 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 05:08:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20001203235452.C165@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 23:54:52 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Peter Samuelson , Christopher Friesen Cc: "Jeff V. Merkey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fasttrak100 questions... In-Reply-To: <8voa7g$d1r$1@forge.tanstaafl.de> <20001129210830.J17523@forge.tanstaafl.de> <20001129165236.A9536@vger.timpanogas.org> <3A266EE7.4C734350@nortelnetworks.com> <20001201214415.E25464@wire.cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <20001201214415.E25464@wire.cadcamlab.org>; from Peter Samuelson on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 09:44:15PM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > [Christopher Friesen] > > I think you should re-read the GPL. You only have to provide source > > to people to whome you have distributed your new binaries, and you > > only have to provide that source if you are asked for it. > > Oh, and you have to provide the complete text of the GPL as well, and > for that you do *not* have a "only if they ask for it" clause. > > Or so it seems to some people, like RMS. See this week's DWN: there is > a nice long discussion in debian-devel about this. Apparently RMS > demands that all GPL'd Debian binary packages include a copy -- it is > not enough that the Debian base system already has a copy and that all > GPL'd source tarballs include a copy. > > I do not agree with this interpretation, because it would mean that any > GPL'd file that can possibly be independently downloaded (such as a .c > file from a CVS server) must include that same 17k document. > > ...But just so everyone knows: according to RMS, every file on your FTP > server that you provide under the GPL v2 must include a copy of the > GPL. (Easy enough to do with tar files, harder for other formats, and > never mind the wasted bandwidth.) Having the GPL in a separate file on > your site does not count, apparently. Hmm, add special code for GPL into gzip ;-). Pavel PS: That's crazy. Including it by reference should be enough. I do not want waste 17K on every file. -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/