Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757244AbZGGOHV (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:07:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755231AbZGGOHK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:07:10 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:57341 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755085AbZGGOHJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 10:07:09 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Ming Lei Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] asm-generic:remove calling flush_write_buffers() in dma_sync_*_for_cpu Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:06:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.30-9-generic; KDE/4.2.95; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "Russell King - ARM Linux" , Alan Cox , Joerg Roedel , fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, "linux-arm-kernel" References: <1246199959-6548-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <20090707074821.GB6995@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Face: I@=L^?./?$U,EK.)V[4*>`zSqm0>65YtkOe>TFD'!aw?7OVv#~5xd\s,[~w]-J!)|%=]> =?utf-8?q?+=0A=09=7EohchhkRGW=3F=7C6=5FqTmkd=5Ft=3FLZC=23Q-=60=2E=60Y=2Ea=5E?= =?utf-8?q?3zb?=) =?utf-8?q?+U-JVN=5DWT=25cw=23=5BYo0=267C=26bL12wWGlZi=0A=09=7EJ=3B=5Cwg?= =?utf-8?q?=3B3zRnz?=,J"CT_)=\H'1/{?SR7GDu?WIopm.HaBG=QYj"NZD_[zrM\Gip^U MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200907071606.48933.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/1Jzyw1JsPx8b54eWMbNC+GiCySV8kZ1eBmij lEiaswa9PGvBG/5yr+EY90PT8buCjsvfCsjYlvMK98xgYu+HDx g3yb90bcypLIyWC/maxWQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 41 On Tuesday 07 July 2009, Ming Lei wrote: > > ARM has two (normal, and dma bounce), and in the long run we need to do > > OK, Can we use dma-mapping-common.h on ARM? It should work in principle. It may be a good idea to also move to the generic swiotlb instead of the traditional dma bounce at the same time. Note that dma-mapping-common.h is only needed if you want to support two or more different DMA implementations in a single kernel, which I'm not sure is needed for ARM. > > cache handling on unmap as well as map due to CPU speculative fetches. > > IMHO, it seems we can fix this problem now. > > For DMA_TO_DEVICE transfer, clean cache in dma map, but does nothing in > dma unmap; > > For DMA_FROM_DEVICE, we may do nothing in dma map, but invaliate cache > in dma unmap. A number of other architectures do this already. You also need to have dma_sync_*_for_cpu and dma_sync_*_for_device, where the *_for_device operation needs to do the same flushing as dma_map_* and *_for_cpu does the same as dma_unmap_*. Note that actually you need to do writeback+invalidate in DMA_TO_DEVICE and at least an invalidate in DMA_FROM_DEVICE during dma_map_*. For the unmap, I don't think you ever need to invalidate the cache. If you invalidate only at unmap time for DMA_FROM_DEVICE, a dirty cache line might be accidentally flushed to the buffer after the device has written to it. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/