Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756285AbZGGRTD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:19:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755197AbZGGRSz (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:18:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:39321 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755083AbZGGRSy (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:18:54 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20090707163336.GE6692@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090707163336.GE6692@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1246976551.3613.33.camel@ht.satnam> <1246975428.3613.10.camel@ht.satnam> <16660.1246981034@redhat.com> To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Jaswinder Singh Rajput , trivial , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] trivial: fix typo "that that" in multiple files Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:17:57 +0100 Message-ID: <19787.1246987077@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1672 Lines: 44 Paul E. McKenney wrote: > The "that that" can read awkwardly even for native English (or, for that > matter, American) speakers, even though it sounds quite natural in spoken > English. I think it sounds quite natural when you say it because you say them differently - or at least I do. The first 'that' is a conjunction, and the second a determinative. Possibly the determinative should be in italics, but that's hard to do in plain text. > Would it be possible to reword as for the RCU example? > ... > "likely that this process will submit another request soon, and that" This is actually the as-iosched.txt example. To use the RCU example: Therefore, as soon as a CPU is seen passing through any of these three states, we know that that CPU has exited any previous RCU read-side critical sections. I think that in this example, "a CPU" should be paired with the "that" determinative because you're not talking about the CPU you've got in your hand per se, but a random CPU over there. If you instead said "this CPU", being more specific, I think that's when you'd use the "this" determinative: Therefore, as soon as this CPU is seen passing through any of these three states, we know that this CPU has exited any previous RCU read-side critical sections. Of course, I'm not a qualified linguist - I know enough to make stuff up and hopefully make it sound plausible. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/