Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:01:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:01:43 -0500 Received: from mailer3.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.128.54]:2972 "EHLO mailer3.bham.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:01:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:01:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Cooke X-X-Sender: mpc@pc24.sr.bham.ac.uk To: Tony Hoyle cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dog slow IDE In-Reply-To: <3C8CB3EB.8070704@nothing-on.tv> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tony, Just a me too earlier today with 2.4.19-pre2-ac4, on a dual celeron 440BX-based system. Im my case, I have 3 hdds in a raid-5, hda, hdb, and hdc. hda and hdb were both performing as expected 18-22MB/sec. hdc was down at the 1.8-2.2MB/sec - even after trying to use hdparm to reset the drive transfer rates (-p, -d1 -X66, -d0 -X12 (to try pio) etc). None of the attempts using hdparm altered the hdc transfer rate in any noticable fashion. I powered down the machine, and on reboot, the hdc transfer rate returned to the expected range 18-22MB/sec), and the raid performance went up to it's usual level from the 5MB/sec it was showing. I couldn't see any reason for the odd behaviour, and I had put it down to 'just one of those things' as the 3 or 4 test reboots since haven't produced the strangely low-transfer rate again. Cheers, Mark On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Tony Hoyle wrote: > For some reason the my IDE is running extremely slow (which accounts for > why this box feels so sluggish). > However: > > /dev/hda: > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 16.27 seconds = 3.93 MB/sec > > /dev/hdb: > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 32.99 seconds = 1.94 MB/sec > > 1.94MB/sec is *way* to slow for a UDMA5 hard disk surely? Yes. On another system, I pull 35-40MB/sec off each individual barracuda IV drive, and 50+ from the combined raid array (I assume PCI bandwidth limited, as twiddling BIOS PCI settings boosted this from 41 to 50). Regards, Mark -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Mark Cooke The views expressed above are mine and are not Systems Programmer necessarily representative of university policy University Of Birmingham URL: http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/~mpc/ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/