Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:51:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:51:42 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:17679 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:51:24 -0500 Message-ID: <3C8CD274.1010603@namesys.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:51:16 +0300 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com CC: Alexander Viro , Richard Gooch , Itai Nahshon , Larry McVoy , Tom Lord , jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing In-Reply-To: <3C8C4B8A.2070508@namesys.com> <20020311061341.A14809@hq.fsmlabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: >On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:15:38AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > >>>The problem is that it doesn't play well with other things. >>> >>Your statement is information free so far, but could be the intro to an >>informative statement....;-) >> > >e.g. link, copy, remove. > In what respect do these not play well? > > > >Look at the Plan9 backup plan. That was much better thought out. > Also not enough said to be informative., but could be an introduction to an informative statement. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/