Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759264AbZGIKTp (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:19:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756453AbZGIKTi (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:19:38 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:58949 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755802AbZGIKTh (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 06:19:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:19:30 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Mike Frysinger Cc: David Howells , rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, gerg@uclinux.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] FDPIC: Ignore the loader's PT_GNU_STACK when calculating the stack size Message-ID: <20090709101930.GJ10937@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20090704024606.GE1345@ucw.cz> <20090701120814.30741.10146.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <24530.1247050900@redhat.com> <20090704033429.GA1799@ucw.cz> <8bd0f97a0907081148vc716eeepfdaf8178b1ecbce1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0907081148vc716eeepfdaf8178b1ecbce1@mail.gmail.com> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1471 Lines: 36 On Wed 2009-07-08 14:48:51, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 23:34, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2009-07-08 12:01:40, David Howells wrote: > >> Pavel Machek wrote: > >> > >> > The patch seems wrong to me; loader needs the stack, too, right? > >> > > >> > What about making sure that the loader specifies reasonable stack > >> > size, instead? > >> > >> The loader doesn't need its own stack, unless it _is_ the executable. ?It uses > >> the executable's stack. ?The problem is that the executable and the loader can > >> both specify the stack size for NOMMU, but which one do we pick, or do we > >> consider both. > > > > Imageine loader needs 64K, while executable only needs 4K. You surely > > want to execute it with 64K stack, because it will not fit into 4K? > > i really dont think this is realistic. there is exactly one ldso that > everyone uses under FDPIC ELF, and it needs a very minuscule stack. Not very realistic; but that argues that the patch is NOP. And if it _is_ realistic, the patch adds a bug. => patch is bad idea. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/