Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760307AbZGIMu1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:50:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759776AbZGIMuR (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:50:17 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]:11111 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759349AbZGIMuP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:50:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xRX7yWVD+ZKqkx/uuZe6f62Qds1hsEAWZxeEv0YxD/uzTR04Zf/PQ8dKvvGQK7WJvq 4ZKceQmJy2HOESgnuOEsgZu4ZXWuVwWcoZaNywru4ooZlP2wWfNfHOcfIPFo5OsygQBC l3JmOvcv/BTp6Px6jyZNBMQfWRkpjw2c1pKpM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3ace41890907090540v6895e2bay8128c0d565a7a55f@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A54FB81.30302@gmail.com> <3ace41890907081449m3ad6c4fdt55781848eedaec1e@mail.gmail.com> <4A551B43.3020104@gmail.com> <3ace41890907082118h52764c98i7ebd9365bcd69b2c@mail.gmail.com> <4A5575C1.8090403@lwfinger.net> <3ace41890907090347m1f337731rb09b90327664ed5@mail.gmail.com> <4A55D123.5090802@gmail.com> <3ace41890907090540v6895e2bay8128c0d565a7a55f@mail.gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_Stefanik?= Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 14:49:54 +0200 Message-ID: <69e28c910907090549q542691fan6756ebf9edac45a9@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: fix supported cards for rtl8187 To: Hin-Tak Leung Cc: Marcin Slusarz , Larry Finger , "John W. Linville" , Linux wireless , Przemyslaw Kulczycki , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1401 Lines: 29 2009/7/9 Hin-Tak Leung : > Here is some info from Gabor (shouldn't this be reply-all rather than just me): > ------------------ > The v1 and v2 look identical (though the label on the device indicates > the revision). The v3 looks completely different. They all have > different USB IDs (v1 is stock RT73, v2 has a custom ID, while v3 is > AFAIK stock RT2070). > ------------------ > > I guess to be informative, may I suggest adding '(for v1 ?see rt73usb, > and v3 see rt3070)' or something similiar to the 'v2' change? > It is fair customary in Kconfig to mention even alternative/competing > drivers for the same device. And when you add v3 support to the rt3070 > driver, a reverse mention may be appropriate. (I guess I am spending > far too long on this discussion - but I reckon, the purpose of a > non-code-changing change is meant to be informative, so one might want > to be as informative as appropriate without being too wordy...) > Yes, sorry, it was intended to be reply-to-all, but Gmail's default-reply-to-all feature appears to be broken. -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/