Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753849AbZGJITH (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:19:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750765AbZGJISx (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:18:53 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:49181 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750722AbZGJISw (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:18:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:18:51 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Vivek Goyal Cc: linux kernel mailing list , Divyesh Shah , Moyer Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: no need to keep track of busy_rt_queues Message-ID: <20090710081851.GY23611@kernel.dk> References: <20090709204759.GF30832@redhat.com> <20090709205108.GG30832@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090709205108.GG30832@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 833 Lines: 21 On Thu, Jul 09 2009, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Resending as had forgotten to put "[PATCH]" in subject line. > > o Get rid of busy_rt_queues infrastructure. Looks like it is redundant. > > o Once an RT queue gets request it will preempt any of the BE or IDLE queues > immediately. Otherwise this queue will be put on service tree and scheduler > will anyway select this queue before any of the BE or IDLE queue. Hence > looks like there is no need to keep track of how many busy RT queues are > currently on service tree. Looks good, I'll queue this up for 2.6.32. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/