Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753637AbZGJI7G (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:59:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751120AbZGJI6z (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:58:55 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:35029 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751045AbZGJI6y (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:58:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend2] Remove 'SBC8240 Wind River' Device Driver Code From: Subrata Modak Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: David Woodhouse Cc: dedekind@infradead.org, Artem Bityutskiy , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, carolyn.j.smith@exgate.tek.com, Stephen Rothwell , Jim Cromie , linux-kernel , Linuxppc-dev , Sachin P Sant , linux-next , Scott Wood , Balbir Singh In-Reply-To: <1247216007.29541.2.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <20090701135247.27488.10776.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1246846628.5743.2.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247205588.20721.353.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247206539.6630.0.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <4A56DD51.5040703@gmail.com> <1247209961.6630.3.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247210095.20721.362.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247215625.6630.6.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> <1247216007.29541.2.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:28:44 +0530 Message-Id: <1247216324.6630.10.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-8.el5_2.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1001 Lines: 29 On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is > > released ? > Hi David, > Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for > 2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32. > > Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it? > It's been like this for _ages_. True. But it gives annoying build fails on randconfig next trees. And we(Sachin & myself) has been reporting it from March/April. If you feel there is still room to be pushed to 2.6.31, then please do it. Else, 2.6.32 will be fine. Thanks for your support. Regards-- Subrata > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/