DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=qqGbtlIUfiNVMQ4MkrdB6bExrwsgIk4xLkm7bS2uCbEOQVgfiQyFLTOsOPeZq70RJ6
         b79tUkX4wCcQPk27Skl0fKKW4UXsgC2Gb2DtSXtaaAqeMVLXvvUD1/TygD5Cqv/scqCb
         vIoQ7BmWQw4/uQM6C7RGv7SVuQwGL+eRSyHjY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907100253560.14601@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <1247156020.27671.40.camel@debian-nb>
	 <20090710084745.GA26752@elte.hu>
	 <1247215920.32044.3.camel@penberg-laptop>
	 <20090710090351.GD14666@wotan.suse.de>
	 <1247217263.771.8.camel@penberg-laptop>
	 <20090710092921.GF14666@wotan.suse.de>
	 <1247218826.771.15.camel@penberg-laptop>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907100243010.14601@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
	 <1247219506.771.22.camel@penberg-laptop>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907100253560.14601@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:10:11 +0300
Message-ID: <84144f020907100310gec596cfo718631df2c7d9b46@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Check write to slab memory which freed already using 
	mudflap
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Janboe Ye <yuan-bo.ye@motorola.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       vegard.nossum@gmail.com, fche@redhat.com, cl@linux-foundation.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1229
Lines: 25

Hi David,

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM, David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> It's my opinion that slab is on its way out when there's no benchmark that
> shows it is superior by any significant amount. ?If that happens (and if
> its successor is slub, slqb, or a yet to be implemented allocator), we can
> probably start a discussion on what's in and what's out at that time.

Performance matters a lot, but it's certainly not the only priority
here. Look at slab, it's bootstrap code is a train-wreck which bit us
in the ass when we did the earlyslab thing and the NUMA support is
pretty horrible. The code base hasn't received much attention for the
past few years so unless someone steps up to clean it all, it's on
it's way out, like it or not.

So if you care about performance and have benchmarks that are _known_
to regress, you might want to focus your efforts on SLUB and/or SLQB
because that's where the action happens these days.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/