Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:56:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:56:01 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:65205 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:55:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:55:43 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: Andre Hedrick cc: Alan Cox , Gunther Mayer , Martin Dalecki , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.6 IDE 19, return of taskfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote: > Well why did you not object to the SCSI sequencer in the past. > Your argument proves that hardware venders will not like Linux and the > childlike additude of not protecting the hardware. ROOT is a brained > GAWD that should run for local Politics. Andre, get a fucking clue. If you claim that your "filtering" provides any security - you are making fradulent claims. End of story. Fact of life: process with EUID 0 can bypass your "protection" easily. IF filtering is useful for some reasons, these reasons have nothing to security. Again, by mentioning security considerations among the reasons you are harming yourself - it's kinda hard to take you seriously if you do not understand the basic stuff. It's not like we didn't have that conversation before... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/