Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753389AbZGJRh1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:37:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752211AbZGJRhQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:37:16 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:35538 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750981AbZGJRhP (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:37:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:36:23 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ming Lei , linux-kernel Subject: Re: Possible memory leak in request_firmware() Message-ID: <20090710173623.GA3687@kroah.com> References: <1246979820.9451.71.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1246979820.9451.71.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 605 Lines: 19 On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 04:17:00PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi, > > I get a couple kmemleak reports like below which I think happen on the > failure path (-ENOENT) of a request_firmware() call: Hm, can you send me the final version of this patch, it seemed to go through a few different versions, with a signed-off-by line? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/