Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758510AbZGKDgS (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:36:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753094AbZGKDgJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:36:09 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60221 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752425AbZGKDgI (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:36:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:34:59 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform_driver_register: warn if probe is in .init.text Message-ID: <20090711033459.GC1344@suse.de> References: <20090616182310.GC13048@pengutronix.de> <1245418939-20758-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20090619141128.GA11506@suse.de> <20090619144354.GA20985@pengutronix.de> <20090629075535.GA20155@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090629075535.GA20155@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3426 Lines: 83 On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:55:35AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:43:54PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 07:11:28AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 03:42:19PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig > > > > --- > > > > drivers/base/platform.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > > > include/linux/kernel.h | 2 ++ > > > > include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > kernel/extable.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > kernel/module.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 5 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c > > > > index 81cb01b..851ba84 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c > > > > @@ -470,11 +470,7 @@ static void platform_drv_shutdown(struct device *_dev) > > > > drv->shutdown(dev); > > > > } > > > > > > > > -/** > > > > - * platform_driver_register > > > > - * @drv: platform driver structure > > > > - */ > > > > -int platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *drv) > > > > +static int __platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *drv) > > > > { > > > > drv->driver.bus = &platform_bus_type; > > > > if (drv->probe) > > > > @@ -489,6 +485,40 @@ int platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *drv) > > > > > > > > return driver_register(&drv->driver); > > > > } > > > > + > > > > +/** > > > > + * platform_driver_register > > > > + * @drv: platform driver structure > > > > + */ > > > > +int platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *drv) > > > > +{ > > > > + int ret = __platform_driver_register(drv); > > > > + > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG) > > > > + /* > > > > + * drivers that are registered by platform_driver_register > > > > + * should not have their probe function in .init.text. The > > > > + * reason is that a probe can happen after .init.text is > > > > + * discarded which then results in an oops. The alternatives > > > > + * are using .devinit.text for the probe function or "register" > > > > + * with platform_driver_probe. > > > > + */ > > > > > > That's not true, remember, drivers built into the system, like platform > > > ones, can have their probe function in .init.text, as it will be called > > > before we discard .init.text, and will never be called again as the > > > device will never be "hot added" at any future time. > > > > > > So this could trigger a lot of false positives :( > > IMHO this is not a false positive. You can still do > > > > for f in unbind bind do echo $deviceid > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/$drivername/$f; done > > > > This type of driver should use platform_driver_probe. > Are you conviced and took the patch or did you give up to convince me? Heh, no, sorry, it got burried in my queue. > I still think the patch is correct and I'd like to have it applied. Ok, let's test it out in the linux-next tree for a while to make sure it works properly. Care to send me an updated version? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/