Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757900AbZGKIP3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:15:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751864AbZGKIPR (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:15:17 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:59289 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751841AbZGKIPQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:15:16 -0400 Subject: [FIX REQUEST] Processor ID should be unsigned int From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput To: LKML Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:44:52 +0530 Message-Id: <1247300092.2678.17.camel@ht.satnam> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-2.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 518 Lines: 19 Hello all, In whole kernel, Processor ID is inconsistent at some places used as int and some places as unsigned int and unsigned. As I spotted earlier in X86: smp.h same structure is using all three types. Do you think there should be some consistency. Thanks, -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/