Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:40:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:40:36 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:49672 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:40:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:39:14 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Rik van Riel , Martin Dalecki , Vojtech Pavlik , Martin Dalecki , LKML Subject: Re: [patch] My AMD IDE driver, v2.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Its quite different to other goings on Alan, did you actually look at the diffs that Martin sent out, or are you just reacting to the description? I think you read more into the description than was actually in the patch itself. Rule #1: always read the patch. Right now, that patch definitely needs to learn to use "yield()" instead of "schedule()" etc details, but I really don't understand why all the brouhaha over Martins patches. Am I really the only one who actually reads the actual _changes_ instead of arguing over personal issues? Now, I've long had this theory that IDE coding is bad for your mental health (you won't ever see _me_ going close to the dang thing - I'll use it, but I won't start writing code for it), but that theory used to be a _joke_, for chrissake! Don't make it appear a truism. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/