Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754677AbZGLO5i (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:57:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753655AbZGLO51 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:57:27 -0400 Received: from toccata.ens-lyon.fr ([140.77.166.68]:37083 "EHLO toccata.ens-lyon.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752071AbZGLO50 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:57:26 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:57:02 -0400 From: Samuel Thibault To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] accessibility, speakup, speech synthesis & /sys Message-ID: <20090712145702.GA4703@const> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090625220452.GF5540@const.famille.thibault.fr> <20090630063454.GI1351@ucw.cz> <20090701221904.GA4431@const> <20090708093516.GE24385@elf.ucw.cz> <20090708094219.GD5451@const.eduroam-ext.univ-nantes.prive> <20090712103133.GE2033@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090712103133.GE2033@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2395 Lines: 58 Pavel Machek, le Sun 12 Jul 2009 12:31:34 +0200, a ?crit : > On Wed 2009-07-08 11:42:19, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Pavel Machek, le Wed 08 Jul 2009 11:35:16 +0200, a ?crit : > > > On Thu 2009-07-02 00:19:04, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Pavel Machek, le Tue 30 Jun 2009 08:34:54 +0200, a ?crit : > > > > > Please keep a11y and similar madness far from kernel. > > > > > > > > What do you qualify as "madness" precisely? Could you explain why you > > > > are using such extreme word? > > > > > > If the word is so long that you have to write number of its letters > > > inside... then you are using wrong word. > > > > Unfortunately that's the word. If the very notion of accessibility was > > realized by mankind earlier maybe we'd have had a shorter word for it. > > "speech" would seem good enough substitute. For the speech case. Then you could have braille, speech recognition, etc. > > > > > BTW... from 486+, cpus are fast enough for speech synthesis. Why not > > > > > doing it in software, viewing hw synthetisers as 'flite coprocessors'? > > > > > > > > At least because flite is very far from proprietary hardware > > > > synthesizers in terms of quality. > > > > > > Well... but for reading boot messages, it might be adequate, right? > > > > I'd actually say it's particularly not adequate. Try to feed your dmesg > > to a speech synthesizer and try to understand it. > > Do you really expect blind people to do kernel hacking? They do. Why shouldn't they be able to? > > > You know... "normal" consoles (such as vt) do fail sometimes, too. > > > > Yes, and in such case sighted and blind users are on equal basis. In > > that case there is no need for a particular support for blind people. > > You know, we do not translate kernel messages into other languages, > either. So maybe we should make sure that Linux machines can be used > without reading dmesg, and just do it from initrd? People can learn english. Blind people can't learn seeing. > After all, most distributions _already_ put splashscreens on, so 99% > of people do not see kernel messages, either... Blindness is orthogonal to that 99%. Samuel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/