Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751399AbZGNAUP (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:20:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751083AbZGNAUO (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:20:14 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:12041 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750913AbZGNAUN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:20:13 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=hMbdnqb+5wY+l0SvGAEq8nJuEQUBWhTrdBmhph03WNafvnT6dzODyLE3SsG0thlVB 4QR8D0n/49RBvIsEnv+9g== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1247530581-31416-1-git-send-email-vbuzov@embeddedalley.com> References: <1246998310-16764-1-git-send-email-vbuzov@embeddedalley.com> <1247530581-31416-1-git-send-email-vbuzov@embeddedalley.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:20:08 -0700 Message-ID: <6599ad830907131720j4f7e1649y4866d2ddeae862c5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Memory usage limit notification feature (v3) From: Paul Menage To: Vladislav Buzov Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Containers Mailing List , Linux memory management list , Dan Malek , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Balbir Singh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1090 Lines: 27 On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Vladislav Buzov wrote: > > The following sequence of patches introduce memory usage limit notification > capability to the Memory Controller cgroup. > > This is v3 of the implementation. The major difference between previous > version is it is based on the the Resource Counter extension to notify the > Resource Controller when the resource usage achieves or exceeds a configurable > threshold. > > TODOs: > > 1. Another, more generic notification mechanism supporting different ?events > ? is preferred to use, rather than creating a dedicated file in the Memory > ? Controller cgroup. I think that defining the the more generic userspace-API portion of this TODO should come *prior* to the new feature in this patch, even if the kernel implementation isn't initially generic. Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/