Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751799AbZGNAbh (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:31:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751359AbZGNAbg (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:31:36 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:60027 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751337AbZGNAbg (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:31:36 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Paul Menage Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Memory usage limit notification feature (v3) Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Vladislav Buzov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Containers Mailing List , Linux memory management list , Dan Malek , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Balbir Singh In-Reply-To: <6599ad830907131720j4f7e1649y4866d2ddeae862c5@mail.gmail.com> References: <1247530581-31416-1-git-send-email-vbuzov@embeddedalley.com> <6599ad830907131720j4f7e1649y4866d2ddeae862c5@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: <20090714093023.6280.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:31:31 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1151 Lines: 30 > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Vladislav > Buzov wrote: > > > > The following sequence of patches introduce memory usage limit notification > > capability to the Memory Controller cgroup. > > > > This is v3 of the implementation. The major difference between previous > > version is it is based on the the Resource Counter extension to notify the > > Resource Controller when the resource usage achieves or exceeds a configurable > > threshold. > > > > TODOs: > > > > 1. Another, more generic notification mechanism supporting different ?events > > ? is preferred to use, rather than creating a dedicated file in the Memory > > ? Controller cgroup. > > I think that defining the the more generic userspace-API portion of > this TODO should come *prior* to the new feature in this patch, even > if the kernel implementation isn't initially generic. I fully agree this ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/