Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754686AbZGNOWX (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:22:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753609AbZGNOWW (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:22:22 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:48016 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753351AbZGNOWV (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:22:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make SCSI SG v4 driver enabled by default and remove EXPERIMENTAL dependency, since udev depends on BSG. From: James Bottomley To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: John Stoffel , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4A5C923B.9090109@panasas.com> References: <1247513973-24899-1-git-send-email-john@stoffel.org> <19035.36432.181354.977939@stoffel.org> <4A5C27D4.5040204@panasas.com> <1247578141.4310.34.camel@mulgrave.site> <4A5C923B.9090109@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:22:16 -0400 Message-Id: <1247581336.4310.60.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1710 Lines: 41 On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:12 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 07/14/2009 04:29 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 09:38 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> On 07/13/2009 10:43 PM, John Stoffel wrote: > >>>>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel writes: > >>> Dammit, I messed up here sending this patch. I've just edited the > >>> subject line and re-sent it with a bit more description. I think this > >>> patch is perfectly good to go into 2.6.31 right now, esp since it's > >>> not changing code, just whether the code is turned on by default from > >>> now on. > >>> > >> I would like it if you'd also CC stable@kernel.org on this patch. As this > >> condition is already true for distros in the field. > > > > The stable tree is for bug *fixes*. Moving an option out from under > > experimental is basically an enhancement, even if it could be argued it > > should have been done long ago. > > > > wouldn't you consider it a bug if a low-level plumbing like Udev is shipped > with hard dependency on it? Sure .. file a bug with udev ... The point is that if you use a feature marked "Experimental, do not use" it's not a bug in the provider if you use it. Arguably, all this really shows is that the distros ignore EXPERIMENTAL, so it's not really serving a useful purpose in the kernel. > if Udev was part of Kconfig it would have a "depend" on bsg. But because > it's a different product it can only rely on defaults? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/