Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755911AbZGNR0h (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:26:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755869AbZGNR0g (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:26:36 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:7248 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755845AbZGNR0f convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:26:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=bt6OrLXgSKF5QW4JM9RlecEgDaQ1C8oH+WCrn3sz1tJTMLTTMxA5Aqb7jz0LcRD9/ I5BS1EPmg7XPZ2tS0/1/A== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090714132538.ac0bc44a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090710230043.16778.29656.stgit@hastromil.mtv.corp.google.com> <20090710230205.16778.11707.stgit@hastromil.mtv.corp.google.com> <4A5AA3E7.9070800@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090713150303.70ab5176.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <2f86c2480907130827u7d2b062bw26bbb80a8e3de657@mail.gmail.com> <20090714084950.2401d9a6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830907132050n226aecb3ucab6746a4d0e81fa@mail.gmail.com> <20090714125334.b476aa78.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <6599ad830907132104o55d31ccexb15e5aa35c31416e@mail.gmail.com> <20090714132538.ac0bc44a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:26:30 -0400 Message-ID: <2f86c2480907141026h7ca27a4fq898c3ee248280a75@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Quick vmalloc vs kmalloc fix to the case where array size is too large From: Benjamin Blum To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Paul Menage , Li Zefan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, serue@us.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 826 Lines: 22 On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:25 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > My point is > ?- More PIDs, More time necessary to read procs file. > This patch boost it ;) Seems like "visit this later again" ,or FIXME patch. > > Thanks, > -Kame Indeed. You'll notice the TODOs in the code here referring to the discussion of a possible dynamic array system in the previous thread. This is simply a correctness patch that aims to keep performance as good as it can for the current approach. (Kame, forgive the double-post; forgot to reply-all the first time) - Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/