Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754204AbZGOLbO (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:31:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753957AbZGOLbN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:31:13 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60729 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753922AbZGOLbN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:31:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina X-X-Sender: jkosina@wotan.suse.de To: Thomas Fjellstrom Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Possible Suspend to Ram bug? In-Reply-To: <200907150359.12187.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> Message-ID: References: <200907100458.27410.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <200907140417.12847.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> <200907150359.12187.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 704 Lines: 20 On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote: > I'll try with debian's 2.6.30 first. But there's a small issue with > that, .30 and .31 seem to have some performance regressions according to > sites like phoronix. You know, there are lies, then horrible lies, then benchmarks, and benchmarks done wrong. Just do your own measurements under your particular workload, and if you see any performance regression, just report it. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/