Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 05:47:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 05:47:20 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:32529 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 05:47:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:46:51 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: wli@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, "Richard B. Johnson" , , , Subject: Re: 2.4.19pre2aa1 In-Reply-To: <20020312070645.X10413@dualathlon.random> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > If you assume a pure random input, I don't see how can you distribute it > better with a simple mul assembler instruction. That's my whole point. Since you've just given two examples of common non-random workloads yourself, I don't see how you can reasonably expect a pure random input. Rik -- http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/