Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:50:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:50:44 -0500 Received: from mailhost.mipsys.com ([62.161.177.33]:40406 "EHLO mailhost.mipsys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:49:49 -0500 From: To: Martin Dalecki , Jeff Garzik Cc: Linus Torvalds , Bill Davidsen , LKML Subject: Re: [patch] My AMD IDE driver, v2.7 Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:33:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20020312003345.606@mailhost.mipsys.com> In-Reply-To: <3C8DE239.2070305@evision-ventures.com> In-Reply-To: <3C8DE239.2070305@evision-ventures.com> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.1.2 F MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Linus, would it be acceptable to you to include an -optional- filter for >> ATA commands? There is definitely a segment of users that would like to >> firewall their devices, and I think (as crazy as it may sound) that >> notion is a valid one. > >If you are *trully paranoid* and want to *fire wall* your device then >the proper way of doing this is to DISABLE those ioctl entierly. >It simple like that. They are not required for regular operation by >concept. Other then this I see no argument here. Well; I don't agree. Firewall via a loadable module can make sense if the actual module does a kind of "filter all but a specified known set of safe commands" for example, like retreiving SMART infos, or such things. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/