Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:44:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:44:41 -0500 Received: from mail.sonytel.be ([193.74.243.200]:27546 "EHLO mail.sonytel.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:44:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:43:39 +0100 (MET) From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Alan Cox cc: lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19-pre3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Here goes -pre3, with the new IDE code. It has been stable enough time in > the -ac tree, in my and Alan's opinion. > > The inclusion of the new IDE code makes me want to have a longer 2.4.19 > release cycle, for stress-testing reasons. It looks like {IN,OUT}_{BYTE,WORD}() are now the arch-specific routines to access the IDE registers, controlled by HAVE_ARCH_{IN,OUT}_BYTE? If yes, - Why not call them ide_{in,out}[bw]()? - What about {in,out}s[wl]{,_swapw}()? Don't we need abstractions for those as well? - The old (ISA/PCI I/O only) {in,out}[bwl]() are still used in many places. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/