Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754412AbZGSNWR (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:22:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754357AbZGSNWP (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:22:15 -0400 Received: from mail-a04.ithnet.com ([217.64.83.99]:52016 "HELO ithnet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754325AbZGSNWO (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:22:14 -0400 X-Sender-Authentication: net64 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:22:10 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: David Rientjes Cc: Jesse Brandeburg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Justin Piszcz Subject: Re: What to do with this message (2.6.30.1) ? Message-Id: <20090719152210.b0ec33d7.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20090718122311.9955e912.skraw@ithnet.com> References: <20090713134621.124aa18e.skraw@ithnet.com> <4807377b0907132240g6f74c9cbnf1302d354a0e0a72@mail.gmail.com> <20090715084754.36ff73bf.skraw@ithnet.com> <20090715113740.334309dd.skraw@ithnet.com> <20090718122311.9955e912.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1443 Lines: 41 On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:23:11 +0200 Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:24:08 -0700 (PDT) > David Rientjes wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > > > > If you have some additional time, it would also be helpful to get a > > > > bisection of when the problem started occurring (it appears to be sometime > > > > between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30). > > > > > > Do you know what version should definitely be not affected? I can check one > > > kernel version per day, can you name a list which versions to check out? > > > > > > > To my knowledge, this issue was never reported on 2.6.29, so that should > > be a sane starting point. > > Todays' news is that 2.6.29.4 has exactly the same problem. I was able to > reproduce it. Tonight I will check out 2.6.28.10. > > -- > Regards, > Stephan I can reproduce the problem with 2.6.28.10. Next in line is 2.6.27.26. In the meantime I do believe that the problem really lies inside the e1000e driver and not the surrounding kernel code. Any other driver shows this behaviour in the same environment, escpecially neither e1000 nor tg3. -- Regards, Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/