Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752867AbZGTHsg (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:48:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752486AbZGTHse (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:48:34 -0400 Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]:36697 "EHLO mtagate3.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752732AbZGTHsd (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:48:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:18 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux Memory Management , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hugh Dickins , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Message-ID: <20090720094818.641e6375@skybase> In-Reply-To: <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <20090715135620.GD7298@wotan.suse.de> <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> Organization: IBM Corporation X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1407 Lines: 37 On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:11:13 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32, > > > so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during > > > the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch > > > around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency > > > on it. > > > > Can't see any problem with that. > > CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so > far nobody objected to the patch itself) > > IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every > time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm > not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc > tree ? > > I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor > arch maintainers :-) Well the change is trivial, it just adds another unused argument to the macros. For the records: it still compiles on s390. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/