Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755155AbZGUNYp (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:24:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754566AbZGUNYo (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:24:44 -0400 Received: from fn.samba.org ([216.83.154.106]:49171 "EHLO lists.samba.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754354AbZGUNYn (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:24:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19045.49553.738185.211806@samba.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:24:33 +1000 To: Pavel Machek Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Cox , James Bottomley , Martin Steigerwald , Jan Engelhardt , Theodore Tso , Rusty Russell , john.lanza@linux.com, OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , corbet@lwn.net, jcm@jonmasters.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions In-Reply-To: <20090721103158.GG4133@elf.ucw.cz> References: <19028.3736.892828.352905@samba.org> <20090708110451.1092afa7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1247066878.4159.153.camel@mulgrave.site> <20090708163736.0f98e7e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1247069202.4159.212.camel@mulgrave.site> <20090708171848.21633768@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <873a96a23x.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87hbxhwv0j.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <19045.14307.658887.752950@samba.org> <4A65875D.7030902@panasas.com> <20090721103158.GG4133@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12 under 22.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Reply-To: tridge@samba.org From: tridge@samba.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1140 Lines: 25 Hi Pavel, > Actually, why not having dosfsck creating _matching_ short names for > long names? As it only writes short names, it should be safe :-). As I mentioned to Boaz, what usually matters for claim construction in patents is the overall system. I'm sure John Lanza would be happy to run through it with you if you want a more legally detailed answer, but basically breaking it up within the one system isn't likely to help us. Like I mentioned to Boaz though, do keep thinking about it. There may well be a better solution that nobody has suggested yet. You might also like to read the file wrapper (availble on the USPTO site) which shows the discussions between the patent office and the applicant. That is often a good source of inspiration for patent workarounds. If you think you've found something then it might be a good idea to raise it with John Lanza first. Cheers, Tridge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/