Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756494AbZGUXFP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:05:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756277AbZGUXFN (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:05:13 -0400 Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:2388 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754461AbZGUXFM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:05:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] move __devinit or __init printk constant format strings to __devinitconst or __initdata? From: Joe Perches To: Matt Mackall Cc: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Gortmaker , David Woodhouse , Tim Bird In-Reply-To: <1248217044.10466.202.camel@calx> References: <1248211253.31365.337.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <1248212925.10466.143.camel@calx> <1248213403.31365.343.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <1248217044.10466.202.camel@calx> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:05:02 -0700 Message-Id: <1248217502.31365.381.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1401 Lines: 34 On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 17:57 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 14:56 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 16:48 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 14:20 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Is moving constant string formats to __devinitconst or __initdata > > > > useful for embedded environments? > > > Interesting notion, but not worth the trouble in my mind. I think it's > > > more worthwhile to look into automatic such stuff in the build somehow. > > I think it's not possible today to get gcc to mark > > the format strings without source modification. > Yep, that's why I specifically said 'build'. It can probably be done in > a post-processing step with some ELF wizardry. Know any elven wizards? > > It's pretty easy to script a source conversion. > > And that script has to be run how often? Once. > I don't think people will find > the churn (and general extra ugliness) acceptable. For a typical > stripped-down embedded kernel, the amount of gain here will be fairly > minimal. I'd be surprised if you got as much as 1K out of it. Got a typical config that uses printks I could try? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/