Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:02:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:02:54 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:40722 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:02:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:02:29 +0000 From: Russell King To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-2.5.6 scsi DMA mapping and compilation fixes (not yet working) Message-ID: <20020313000229.D13558@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200203122355.PAA08344@adam.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200203122355.PAA08344@adam.yggdrasil.com>; from adam@yggdrasil.com on Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote: > Are you talking about an event that occurred in the 2.4 > tree or the 2.5 tree? Are you saying that the newer driver in > 2.4 was reverted back to the older driver (i.e., the one that > is in 2.5), or are you saying that someone made some attempt > at porting the 2.5 tree's NCR53C80 driver the new DMA mapping > interface and then backed them out? Someone had a go at "making 2.5 compile" without taking Alan's 2.4 changes. It went into Linus tree. It got subsequently reverted because of the reasons I outlined in my previous mail. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/