Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:42:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:42:50 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:25340 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:42:38 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <3C8E6C63.E8B72195@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3C8E6C63.E8B72195@zip.com.au> <3C8D9999.83F991DB@zip.com.au>, <3C8D9999.83F991DB@zip.com.au> To: Andrew Morton Cc: Daniel Phillips , lkml Subject: Re: [CFT] delayed allocation and multipage I/O patches for 2.5.6. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:42:15 +0000 Message-ID: <5812.1015980135@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org akpm@zip.com.au said: > Really, I don't think we can lose page->buffers for *enough* users of > address_spaces to make it worthwhile. > If it was only being used for, say, blockdev inodes then we could > perhaps take it out and hash for it, but there are a ton of > filesystems out there... I have plenty of boxes which never have any use for page->buffers. Ever. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/